Acquisition Management Policy   (Revised 11/2009)

download AMS

2.5.1 : What Must Be Done (Revised 11/2009)    

  • Finalize program planning. The service organization reviews and updates program planning completed during final investment analysis (i.e., implementation strategy and planning document). Key stakeholders participate in this activity to ensure planning is complete and realistic. For example, if new systems are to be installed or existing facilities modified, service organization planners work with service-area offices so people and resources will be available when needed.
  • Obtain the solution. The service organization oversees and coordinates execution of tasks and activities necessary to achieve the benefits projected for the investment program within approved cost and schedule baselines. This includes such activities as contract award, contract administration, program management, resource management, risk management, systems engineering, logistics support, test and evaluation, and site acquisition and adaptation. It may involve developing operational procedures and standards; obtaining physical, personnel, and information security; modifying the physical infrastructure; and coordinating collateral action by the aviation industry.
  • Verify Operational Readiness. The service organization manages all activities necessary to install the solution at a designated test site(s) and test it thoroughly to verify operational readiness. Operational readiness encompasses operational effectiveness and operational suitability. Operational effectiveness measures how well the solution satisfies mission need and operational requirements. Operational suitability measures how well a product can be integrated and employed for field use, considering such factors as compatibility, reliability, human performance factors, maintenance and logistics support, safety, and training. For designated programs, operational readiness is also assessed by independent operational test and evaluation. The solution may be installed, as necessary, at the FAA Academy, FAA Logistics Center, and William J. Hughes Technical Center before the in-service decision. In rare cases and with proper justification, the service organization may request authority to install at  other specific sites. This authorization does not affect the regular in-service review process culminating in a final in-service decision, which must be adhered to before a product can be placed into operational service through the declaration of operational readiness date (ORD) and commissioning.
  • Prepare for in-service decision. The service organization completes all activities necessary for the in-service decision. This includes resolution of all support issues identified by the operating service organization and integrated logistics management team; completion of management actions arising from the in-service review checklist and IOT&E report (designated programs only); resolution of stakeholder issues; development of the in-service decision briefing and action plan; and concurrence of key stakeholders.
  • Update planning for in-service management. The service organization plans how it will sustain and manage deployed assets throughout their full lifecycle. This includes in-service support, post implementation reviews and other evaluations of operational assets to measure performance, collection of performance data in support of service-level reviews, product sustainment strategy and actions, service-life extension, and eventual removal from service including site restoration.
  • Deploy the solution at all sites. The service organization manages all activities necessary to deploy the solution at each site. This includes transportation and delivery of equipment, installation and checkout, contractor acceptance and inspection, integration, field familiarization, declaration of initial operational capability, joint acceptance and inspection, dual operations, declaration of operational readiness, and removal and disposal of obsolete equipment. Post implementation reviews are conducted at deployment sites to ensure user needs are satisfied, identify systemic problems that must be corrected, and determine whether cost, schedule, and benefits objectives are being achieved. The transition from solution implementation to in-service management extends over time, occurring at each site upon declaration of operational readiness or commissioning.

Investment programs that develop, modernize, or enhance systems or software follow the knowledge-based product development process shown in Figure 2.5.1-1. Table 2.5.1-1 contains the timing, criteria, and authority for each decision point.

Figure 2.5.1-1 FAA Knowledge-Based Product Development Process

Table 2.1.5-1 Product Development Decision Points, Timing, Criteria, and Authority

Decision Point

Timing

Decision Authority

Decision Criteria

Product Demonstration Decision

After critical design review

Vice President or Director of the implementing service organization

 

  • Key product characteristics are defined
  • Stakeholders agree that product design and functionality satisfy customer requirements
  • System design reviews are complete
  • Engineering drawings are complete
  • Detailed software/firmware design is complete, including critical software processes and threads
  • RMA goals are defined and planning is complete
  • Failure modes and effects analysis is complete
  • Critical manufacturing processes are identified

Production Decision

After completion of  operational testing

Vice President or Director of the implementing service organization *

  • First-article satisfies customer requirements in an operational environment
  • Data demonstrate that critical manufacturing processes and components will achieve RMA goals
  • First-article achieves contract RMA requirements
  • Stakeholders agree design is producible

* Unless otherwise designated by the JRC at the final investment decision.